Sunday, May 31, 2015

It's a Different World



“The world is different these days.”
“Things just aren’t what they used to be.”

These phrases are uttered so often it’s now accepted that being a teacher in today’s world is vastly different from yester years. . Kids are more difficult. They are unmotivated and lack discipline. Parents aren’t doing their jobs in teaching many necessary skills, so our job has expanded beyond what we should have to teach.  As a relatively new teacher, I do not possess the decades long scope to judge the validity of such assertions. However, since this is the general attitude of many of my colleagues, I accept it and move on. After all, I teach in public school and am contractually bound to teach whoever shows up at the door, right? So does it really matter if kids are different?

My reality is that I am a language arts teacher, but my teaching responsibilities do not end there. Part of my job is to shape these young minds to think, reason, and make wise choices as they grow and encounter life’s hurdles, pitfalls, and joys. Sometimes these lessons are actually planned while others emerge through those blink and you’ll miss them teachable moments. Other times, learning happens when you least expect it.

I have always been fascinated by the logistics behind learning.  As a parent, I marveled at how my boys acquired understanding of their world sometimes just by watching; other times they engaged in what appeared to be close examination of stimuli. Still, other learning happened as a result of my deliberate intention to work with my children on a skill, which ultimately translated into increased abilities as a classroom teacher. Even though my actions were planned, the whole process was often mysterious as sometimes they mastered certain things quickly while other times they floundered after repeated attempts. Even though they failed, wasn’t there something gained in the process itself? If so, was that learning?

Certainly, learning has been concretely defined by psychologists over the years, but the definition has definitely expanded as our understanding of the human mind grows. I feel in some ways, though, that this chase for understanding will be ceaseless because of the precise nature of learning. Not to sound too philosophical, but I believe strongly in a collective learning that coincides with individual learning. One prime example of this is the influence of technology. We are altering our learning patterns and behavior thanks to our reliance upon and immersion into screens. We teachers see this in practice daily, and some are making the necessary adjustments to accommodate the varied needs of our learners. For example, my students and I read "The Maze Runner" this spring and even though I had a class set of books for the students to use, many preferred to read off the screen, which was mind boggling as part of my love of reading is wrapped in the smell and feel of a book.

So if learning is the ultimate goal of my chosen career, I find myself so very often learning things myself! And for that, I'm incredibly grateful. I don't sit at a desk and complete the same mundane tasks from year to year. Far from that, I am thrown into situations daily that cause me to sit and observe, experiment, flounder, and keep trying as I chase the ever elusive "knowledge" in the genuine hope that when it is my turn to look back at decades worth of teaching, I can smile and note, "The world is different these days, and I'm so glad for it."

Sunday, May 24, 2015

The Million Dollar Question

May 24, 2015

The million dollar question: nature or nurture? This phrase has been uttered so often it is firmly rooted in the American vernacular. At this point in the discussion, I believe most people recognize that human behavior cannot be explained with just one mode of thinking. We all are born with certain tendencies that are suppressed or elicited based on our experiences.

Two psychologists, Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, proposed theories of development that put forth the nature and nurture viewpoints. While Piaget's theory emphasized a set path on which children travel as they acquire and develop cognitive skills, Vygotsky's work examined the context of behaviors that will manifest cognitive development.

So who's right? Simply put: both. I do not claim to be an authority on human development; however, as a teacher of 150+ teenagers annually, I have an deep bank of anecdotes that provide observational data supporting the notion that my students should be in the early stages of the formal operational stage where they will begin embarking on abstractions but many exhibit atypical intellectual behaviors. This makes sense. We are creatures who can be easily influenced and often are; peer pressure is an effective tactic. Therefore, we may be wired to develop certain skills at certain ages, but our experiences and environment more than likely contribute to the pace students take through Piaget's stages.

This is crucial for teachers to understand, embrace, and remember because our students come from varied backgrounds and have experienced diverse situations. Some may have limited experience and therefore struggle to apply concepts to new constructs. Others may be worldly in some areas but limited in others. Because of this, it is our responsibility to cultivate relationships with our students to better understand their individual capabilities. Sometimes assessments assist us with this task, but most often, it's in the getting-to-know-you stage that can truly help illuminate a student's cognitive ability.

For me, this is one reason I find grouping students by age to be an antiquated and short-sighted practice. One thing human beings are fundamentally not is robots! So, why must we insist that all 12 year-olds possess the same skill sets or are ready for certain tasks? Are we that banal and uncreative that we couldn't devise a more fluid system for grade placement and promotion and retention whereby students are grouped based on actual abilities? To be clear, I am not proposing tracking; there is a vast difference. However, I do believe that in order for our society to properly educate our youth in this vastly diverse nation, we must work to devise some varied solutions so we truly have no child left behind. I suppose herein lies the actual million dollar question.


Tuesday, May 12, 2015

First Post

5/12/15
My textbook arrived yesterday, and I tore into it like a giddy child. I'm incredibly thrilled to return to my roots after many years away from the field of psychology.  I look forward to revisiting some concepts and learning many new things.